What's A Gauge Blow Out

By eliminating access to secondary education.

Originally posted by ihistorian at By eliminating access to secondary education.

I have already published an open letter to the teacher Chistyakov, which stirred the public to protect affordable full secondary education, which is actually scheduled to liquidate in the future it is planned "Prihvatizatsii schools.
How is the situation today? Information about this distinguished sverc

"The website of the Ministry of Education and Science, he has appeared - new version of the standard for high school (10-11 th grades) . The promised public pressure is a serious revision of the standard for actually turned out to be banal and distributing a complete profanation. Meaningfully in the standard is not changed practically nothing. No claims of scientific, educational and the parent community does not actually have it taken into account. Everything is reduced to "commas permutations.

most important thing - the idea of professional education in high school, which portrayed the developers as their achievement, in fact, that in the old version of the standard that the new total was a profanation, so as to select all objects of interest of a young person can not block. For example, for the humanities standard permits only choose two (!) the subject of five:

"3. Social Sciences
«Social Studies (integrated level)
« History "(Basic or profile level)
« Geography (Baseline or profile level)
«Economy" (profile level)
«Law (profile level)

The student selects one or two subjects on any of
submitted their levels of study (p. 57).

Same for the "naturalist":

"5. Natural Sciences
«Natural History (integrated level)
«Physics" (base or profile level)
«Chemistry (basic or profile level)
« Biology (basic or profile level)
«Ecology" (baseline)
The student selects one or two subjects at any level
their study (p. 57).

That is, you can choose only two subject to their profile. And the rest? And for them to pay. And no money - no education. Go, cars unloaded. Free time to teach physics chemistry and biology would be impossible. Is this a standard prohibits its insistent "no more".

No more, no more, no more ... Not more than nine items can be study students (S. 58). That is possible, of course, and more but for the money. For the vast majority of young citizens of Russia - the standard - the verdict. Sentence to the extreme low level of education and, consequently, the impossibility of complete self-realization in accordance with their inclinations. The majority of Russian citizens in fact, tightly attached to the bottom of the social as well as those who have no money for it to take paid lessons or hire private tutors, can not well prepare for the CT examinations and in universities. As a result, most Russians will be not only materially but also in the educational poverty.

This standard is a direct attack on the right of all citizens of Russia to affordable and quality secondary education, written in the Constitution.

As public demand were ignored and no substantial changes in the standard post-revision "has not appeared, and apparently the designers did not set such goals, I think that whatever was further dialogue with Kondakov & Co. is impossible. All Russian citizens who are expensive future of our country should require by the President and Government:

1) Complete rejection of the proposed standard as trampling on the constitutional rights of citizens of Russia to free quality secondary education and virtually eliminates high-grade publicly available secondary education in the country;

2) Create a new group to develop standard of the leading scientists of the RAS, RAO and leading universities of the country, which will not include any of those who developed this version of the standard;

3) Layoffs A Kondakova with post of general director of publishing house "Enlightenment". The man actually offered the project eliminate a public secondary education in the country and publicly stated that it "patriotic education is more important than physics and mathematics" can not occupy the post of director of one of the largest in country's educational publishers.

think it would be nice to make the corresponding open letter like first open letter against This standard . Then still had hope that its developers under pressure from the public will go for dramatic changes in your project no. Now This hope has died. It is clear that by the standards developers have banal sabotage the requirements for scientific, educational and parental community by radical processing standard. Talk to them nothing more - should demand their removal from the development standard. "

Channel.

We have allowed they prihvatizirovat our factories. They have ceased to produce products.
We allowed them prihvatizirovat ground. Now a piece of land could cost us more expensive homes.
We allowed them prihvatizirovat electrical system. Payment for electricity has increased dramatically, as plants began to crumble.
We allowed them to prihvatizirovat utilities. Rents were prohibitive, and maintenance of homes is even worse.

Today they want prihvatizirovat school. Result will be "as usual" - we will pay much more, and the quality of education will fall through the floor.